9th Circuit Court Orders EPA Ban Of Chlorpyrifos Pesticide Harmful To Children’s Brains Within 60 days

by Bamidele Ogunberu Posted on August 9th, 2018

San Francisco, California, USA : The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a 2-1 decision on Thursday, ordered the Trump administration to revoke approval for a widely used pesticide, chlorpyrifos, that studies show can harm the brains of children.

The court gave the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, 60 days to ban chlorpyrifos, a pesticide initially developed as a nerve gas during World War II.

The decision stemmed from a 2007 petition by two environmental groups to prevent the chemical from being used on food.

The groups cited studies that found children and infants who had been exposed prenatally to low doses of chlorpyrifos suffer from reduced IQ, attention deficit disorders and delayed motor development that lasts into adulthood.

“The EPA failed to take any decisive action in response to the 2007 petition, notwithstanding that the EPA’s own internal studies continued to document serious safety risks associated with chlorpyrifos use, particularly for children,” New York District Judge Jed S. Rakoff, who was filling in on the 9th Circuit, wrote for the panel.

“The court affirmed that EPA’s job is to protect public health, not industry profits — and found that their reversal of the planned ban of this brain-harming pesticide was in fact illegal.”

The 9th Circuit said the federal government has repeatedly stalled taking action on the chemical.

“The time has come to put a stop to this patent evasion,” wrote Rakoff, a Clinton appointee. Ninth Circuit Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen, an Obama appointee, joined the ruling.

The 9th Circuit called the delays “particularly prejudicial here where the continued use of chlorpyrifos is associated with severe and irreversible health effects.”

The court said the EPA had violated Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. The laws require the EPA to ban a pesticide from use on food unless there is reasonable certainity that it will cause no harm, the court said.

“The EPA has never made any such determination and, indeed, has itself long questioned the safety of permitting chlorpyrifos to be used within the allowed tolerances,” Rakoff wrote.

Judge Ferdinand Fernandez, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, dissented. He argued the appeals court lacked the authority to order a ban pending further review by the EPA.

“Children, farmworkers, rural families and science are all huge winners today,” said Kristin Schafer, executive director of Pesticide Action Network North America.

The United Farm Workers praised the decision.

“The EPA has put the women and men who harvest the food we eat every day in harm’s way too long by allowing the continued use of this dangerous neurotoxin,” said Erik Nicholson, United Farm Workers of America national vice-president. “We commend the court for doing what EPA should have done years ago. The people who feed us deserve a safe and healthy workplace.”

“This decision to tell the EPA to do the ban is a pretty bold move,” said Kristen Boyles, a staff attorney for Earthjustice, who represented environmental and farm worker groups in the case. “But remember the EPA itself said it was going to do this two years ago. The court is following the science the EPA released to the pubic in 2016.”

The Obama administration proposed banning the pesticide’s use on food crops, but former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt reversed course last year and decided to retain the pesticide.

Since Pruitt’s action, several states, including California, joined the litigation in favor of banning the pesticide.

The most recent figures available indicate the pesticide is used on 640,709 acres in California.

Use in California has declined from a peak of more than 2 million pounds in 2005 to 902,275 pounds in 2016.

“Some things are too sacred to play politics with — and our kids top the list,” said Erik Olson, a senior director at the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the plaintiffs in the case. “The court has made it clear that children’s health must come before powerful polluters.”

Dow Chemical, the nation’s largest manufacturer of chlorpyrifo, donated $1 million for Trump’s inauguration.

The chemical is used on fruits, vegetables and nuts. Hawaii has banned it, and California scientists have listed it as an air contaminant and developmental toxicant, saying it poses risks to children in the air, water and food.

Author

Bamidele Ogunberu

Bamidele Ogunberu

Staff Writer
Phone
Email

Leave a Reply