Trump Taps Heather Nauert To Serve As U.N. Ambassador, William Barr As Attorney General

by Ike Obudulu Posted on December 7th, 2018

“Heather Nauert will be nominated for the ambassador to the United Nations,” Trump announced in remarks to reporters before leaving for an event in Missouri Friday.

President Trump said Friday he plans to nominate State Department spokeswoman and former Fox News anchor Heather Nauert as his next ambassador to the United Nations. Trump also said he will nominate William “Bill” Barr to serve as attorney general, replacing Jeff Sessions, who resigned under pressure from Trump last month.

“She’s very talented, very smart, very quick, and I think she’s going to be respected by all,” Trump said of Nauert, a former Fox News anchor.

However, according to reports, Trump’s pick could face a tough Senate confirmation process due to her thin resume and the president’s unorthodox foreign policy push into the congressional spotlight at at a time of America’s increasing isolation at the global stage.

Nauert has been a “leading contender” to represent the US to the international organization since Haley announced a couple of months ago that she would be leaving her post.

Critics say that Nauert lacks the kind of in-depth policy knowledge or political background needed to represent the country at the UN.

“The United Nations is the big leagues of diplomacy,” said Brett Bruen, who was a director of global engagement in the Obama administration. “This is the most egregious example of Trump filling critical national security jobs by using a superficial casting criteria more appropriate for reality shows than the dangerous realities of today’s world.”

Meanwhile, David Bosco, a professor of international relations at Indiana University, said Nauert would definitely be one of the least experienced person for the UN job.

“Her only real foreign policy is this stint at the State Department in a kind of spokesperson role,” he noted. “Nor does she have what Haley had, which was significant high-level governing experience. So as I look at who we have had in this position over the decades, I think Nauert would be one of the least prepared for this position.”

Haley, a former South Carolina governor and rising Republican star, unexpectedly announced her resignation in October and promised to serve at the position through the end of 2018.

She was one of the first members of President Trump’s cabinet, confirmed four days after his inauguration.

In her resignation letter, Haley dismissed the possibility of running against Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

Trump picks William Barr as new attorney general

Trump on Friday also nominated William Barr, a former attorney general under George H.W. Bush, to head the Justice Department.

“He was my first choice since day one,” Trump told reporters. “He ‘ll be nominated.”

Last month, Trump fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

“We are pleased to announce that Matthew G. Whitaker, Chief of Staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions at the Department of Justice, will become our new Acting Attorney General of the United States,” Trump said in a tweet.

“We thank Attorney General Jeff Sessions for his service, and wish him well! A permanent replacement will be nominated at a later date,” he added.

Sessions, a longtime Alabama senator and one of the key elements behind Trump’s surprise election win in 2016, ran the Justice Department for nearly two years.

Mr. Barr has criticized aspects of the Russia investigation, including suggesting that the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, hired too many prosecutors who had donated to Democratic campaigns. Mr. Barr has also defended Mr. Trump’s calls for a new criminal investigation into his defeated 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton, including over a uranium mining deal the Obama administration approved when she was secretary of state.

“There is nothing inherently wrong about a president calling for an investigation,” Mr. Barr said last year. “Although an investigation shouldn’t be launched just because a president wants it, the ultimate question is whether the matter warrants investigation.”

Mr. Barr added then that he saw more basis for investigating the uranium deal than any supposed conspiracy between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia. “To the extent it is not pursuing these matters, the department is abdicating its responsibility,” he said.

Mr. Barr has assembled a “generally mainstream G.O.P. and corporate” reputation, said Norman L. Eisen, who served as special counsel for ethics and government overhaul under President Barack Obama. But he predicted that Mr. Barr would be vigorously vetted because of what he saw as blots on Mr. Barr’s record, including his push for scrutiny of the mining deal, involving a company called Uranium One.

Mr. Barr “has put forward the discredited idea that Hillary Clinton’s role in the Uranium One deal is more worthy of investigation than collusion between Trump and Russia,” Mr. Eisen wrote in a text message. “That is bizarre. And he was involved in the dubious George H. W. Bush end of term pardons that may be a precedent for even more illegitimate ones by Trump.”

A graduate of George Washington University’s law school, Mr. Barr, 68, got his start in the 1970s working for the C.I.A. and later worked in the Reagan White House before leaving for private practice. In 1989, President George Bush appointed him to lead the Justice Department’s powerful Office of Legal Counsel, later elevating him to deputy attorney general and then attorney general.

After the Bush administration, Mr. Barr spent most of his postgovernment career as the top lawyer for the telecommunications company that became Verizon, from which he retired in 2008. He later joined the Kirkland & Ellis law firm.

In a November 1992 speech, Mr. Barr put forward the ideal of an attorney general whose primary loyalty is to the rule of law, not to the president who appointed him — saying that he must provide “unvarnished, straight-from-the-shoulder legal advice” with no regard to political considerations like what conclusions the White House might prefer.

“The unique position of the attorney general raises special considerations,” Mr. Barr said. “The attorney general’s oath to uphold the Constitution raises the question whether his duty lies ultimately with the president who appointed him or more abstractly with the rule of law. I said in my confirmation hearings, and have said several times since, that the attorney general’s ultimate allegiance must be to the rule of law.”

Still, he also said that in his experience, he confronted no conflicts between his duty to uphold the law and his policy allegiance to the president.

Perhaps not coincidentally, Mr. Barr developed a reputation as a proponent of a sweeping theory of the president’s constitutional authority to act without congressional permission or in defiance of statutes.

In July 1989, shortly after his appointment to the Office of Legal Counsel, Mr. Barr sent an apparently unsolicited 10-page memo to top agency and department lawyers across the executive branch urging vigilance in pushing back against ways in which Congress might try to intrude on what he saw as the rightful powers of the president. It covered topics such as “attempts to gain access to sensitive executive branch information” and efforts to limit a president’s power to fire a subordinate official without a good cause.

“It is important that all of us be familiar with each of these forms of encroachment on the executive’s constitutional authority,” Mr. Barr wrote. “Only by consistently and forcefully resisting such congressional incursions can executive branch prerogatives be preserved.”

Years later, in 2005, after the leaking of a secret George W. Bush administration memo blessing the torture of terrorism detainees despite anti-torture laws and treaties, Neil Kinkopf, a Georgia State law professor who worked in the Office of Legal Counsel during the Clinton administration, pointed back to Mr. Barr’s 1989 memo as a precursor to the torture memo’s vision of unfettered executive power.

“Never before had the Office of Legal Counsel, known as the O.L.C., publicly articulated a policy of resisting Congress,” Mr. Kinkopf wrote in a Legal Affairs essay. “The Barr memo did so with belligerence, staking out an expansive view of presidential power while asserting positions that contradicted recent Supreme Court precedent.”

He added, “Bridging a 15-year gap, the Barr memo provides the theoretical and strategic foundations for the torture memo.”

Many proponents of strong presidential powers nevertheless say that Congress can check the presidency through its power over government spending. But at a 1990 symposium, Mr. Barr invoked a constrained understanding of lawmakers’ ability to cut off funds for government actions they oppose, declaring that “Congress cannot use the appropriations power to control a presidential power that is beyond its direct control.”

And when issues of war power came up — like Mr. Bush’s 1989 invasion of Panama, the 1990-91 Persian Gulf War or the 1992 deployment of troops to Somalia — Mr. Barr repeatedly told Mr. Bush that he could deploy American troops without specific prior authorization from Congress.

One drawback from Mr. Trump’s perspective may be that in 1992, Mr. Barr decided to trigger the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate whether senior Bush administration officials had committed a crime by searching Bill Clinton’s passport file while he was a presidential candidate. The prosecutor took three years to finish that investigation, ultimately concluding that no crime had been committed and that he should not have been appointed.

But at a 1997 panel discussion on the independent counsel law, Mr. Barr criticized the statute and expressed concern about using the criminal justice system to prosecute high-level executive branch officials over minor offenses, saying such conduct should be checked by politics. The context was allegations that the vice president at the time, Al Gore, had made political fund-raising calls from inside the White House.

“I’m not going to prosecute the vice president of the United States because he made five phone calls to raise money from the White House — it’s ridiculous. It’s not in the public interest,” Mr. Barr said, adding: “Let the attorney general take the heat, if there is heat, publicly for it.”

Image : Trump Taps Heather Nauert (right) To Serve As U.n. Ambassador, William Barr As Attorney General

Author

Ike Obudulu

Ike Obudulu

Versatile Certified Fraud Examiner, Chartered Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor with an MBA in Finance And Investments who has both worked for and consulted with some of the world's largest companies on main street and wall street in over 20 countries, Ike brings his extensive reporting and investigations experience to bear on his role as Chief Editor.
Phone
Email

Leave a Reply